AI research

AI tools for literature reviews: a documented workflow

Use AI to assist paper discovery and organization while preserving search criteria, original sources, and a reviewable evidence trail.

Research papers connected to a central evidence card
Original GuidePebble illustration. Current product facts and sources are explained below.

Direct answer

AI can assist discovery, summarization, and organization. A literature review still needs a defined question, explicit inclusion criteria, and a record of how papers were selected. Do not treat an assistant's concise answer as proof of an exhaustive search.

Match the tool to the stage

StageTool to investigateImportant distinctionCheckedSource
Find a candidate collectionElicitSearch and summaries differ from paid review and export workflows2026-10-22Plans
Explore a question in papersConsensusFree Deep reviews have a separate allowance; Pro-message sources conflict2026-10-22Plans
Organize selected sourcesGemini NotebookA selected notebook is not an exhaustive literature search2026-10-22Notebook limits

Keep the review reproducible

Define the population, intervention or topic, date range, and eligible study types before searching. Save the search terms and dates. For each candidate paper, record why it was included or excluded, whether full text was available, and where each extracted claim appears.

A useful evidence table includes the paper identifier, design, sample, relevant result, limitations, and source passage. Ask an assistant to help organize that table, then inspect each row. A missing full text should remain an explicit limitation rather than being filled from an assumed result.

Choose around the output you need

If you must export references or retain structured screening decisions, inspect the exact paid workflow before subscribing. If you only need to orient yourself to a new topic, free search may be sufficient to start. Read Elicit vs Consensus and SciSpace vs Elicit for the documented tradeoffs.

This article covers assembling a collection. For interpreting one paper, use the research-paper reading workflow.

Sources and method

Official documentation checked 2026-10-22. This is source-based editorial analysis, not a hands-on test or benchmark. Plan and redemption rules can change. Follow the linked primary sources and confirm the current account terms before acting.

Related resources

Sources & verification

  1. elicit.com — pricing
  2. help.consensus.app — subscription plans
  3. help.consensus.app — how to use deep search
  4. support.google.com — 16213268
  5. blog.google — notebooklm gemini notebook
  6. scispace.com — pricing

GuidePebble is an independent publication. How affiliate relationships work.